In the course of a story you are going to refer to each character
several times, however, you do not want to be repeated "Luke said" or
"Luke wrote" or "Luke did whatever" over and over again. The repetition
of the name would get grating on the reader and it has the character of
an inexpert speaker.
Think about how people talk in real
life. When we encounter someone that simply repeats the name over and
over again when labeling who is doing what, we get irritated at hearing
"Luke", or whatever name is being used, incessantly. It becomes like a
drum beat where we can mark the time by the use of that name.
Some
times you want to give that impression of the same word repeated over
and over again as it can add to tension in some cases. However, used
too often and it simply becomes annoying.
English has a built
in solution for this problem in the form of pronouns, but even in that
case, you've switched from one distinctive beating sound to
two. Instead of beating the same drum over and over, you're now
switching between two drums, or, more likely, you'll beat one drum
frequently and occasionally switch over to the other at dramatic points.
In that case the drum beat sounds like "Luke he he he he he Luke he he he he he Luke he he he he he..." and so on.
The solution is simply: you need to give the characters, especially important characters, more than the one name.
By
this, I don't simply mean to give the same character a bunch of given
names, but that each character should have several short descriptive
phrases that specifically meant to indicate them.
These names
can come from different combinations of their given name, based on
occupation, descriptive phrases, titles, nicknames given to them by
other characters or anything else.
Let's
look at Lucretia from Bystander. The following phrases are used to
describe Lucretia in the first book, though in some cases only once or
twice.
Lucretia, Lu, parolee peak, silver-haired peak,
silver-haired young woman, librarian, ex-con, bystander, Kimono, young
peak, older peak and the hostess.
In addition, her
variety of names give me some quick ways to remind my readers of parts
of her character in the course of the story. This reminder can be
either appropriate or inappropriate to the situation.
For
example, I might want to suddenly remind the reader in the middle of a
sequence that Lucretia's day job is that of a librarian. If I use this
while she's fighting or running for her life in some sort of fight or
crisis, then it instantly places the image of her shelving books on top
of the current scene. That's a somewhat disjointed image that makes for
a bit of amusement on the part of the reader.
Of course, the
action-librarian has become something of a common trope of late, so it
doesn't any longer have the sort of impact it used to.
Occupational
names have some problem when you are dealing with characters who share
occupations. Looking back at Bystander again, I often use "the
mercenary" to describe Robles, Kali and their underlings. However,
names have to be exclusive to a particular character within the
scene. If I call Jason "the mercenary" then I cannot also use that term
for anybody else in the same scene or else I risk confusing identities.
In
Bystander's case, I simply shift to other titles. Kali or Robles can
both become "ex-goddess", Sightseer is the "sniper" and Isaiah is the
"drone master". When Kali and Robles are in the same scene, then I
could have refered to them as the "templar goddess" and the "ascended
goddess" respectively, however, the need did not present itself, so that
might come later.
Also note which names each character uses for each other.
Lucretia
calls most people by their last names if she knows it. However, she
often calls Robles "Sergeant" the way the others do and she calls Novac
"the Old Man", also like the other mercenaries do. She calls Sightseer
by his given first name, "Eldon" however. All three of these exceptions
are indicative of how she feels about the characters. Robles and Novac
are rather parental figures, while she wants to be closer to Sightseer.
Also
note that most of the people who are friendly with Lucretia end up
calling her "Lu" rather than Lucretia. The villains refer to her by
names meant to objectify her such as "bystander" and "Kimono".
Of
more note is the exchange between Kali and Robles when the latter
reveals her presence to the former. Kali refers to Robles by her
codename, "Tlazolteotl", while Robles calls Kali by her rank and family
name, "Sergeant Jasthi."
This shows that Kali has become
more than a little unhinged by what she has been facing since becoming a
goddess and has started to associate with the implications of the
codename and abandoning her old name. Robles, meanwhile, is still
firmly grounded in reality and her normal, birth identity. There use of
the others' unprefered names shows an attempt by each to impose their
paradigm of thought on the other.
Kali is identifying Robles as a goddess, a mythical figure, while Robles is reminding Kali that they're just people.
Note
that the more important a character, the more names and labels that
they are likely to have. However, also note that the number of names
increases when you have the same character being described from multiple
different perspectives.
Lucretia is not only the main
character of the story, she is the title character. The world revolves
around her from a literary point of view, other things are going on in
the world, but the story focuses on the things that affect her.
Bystander
shows the perspectives of several different people and how they view
her. She is described alternately by herself, Robles, Grant, Sightseer,
Novac, Kali, Jason, Isaiah, Det Assaf and Det Park. Since each of
these characters sees her slightly different, they each use different
terms when referring to her and thus a multitude of names are born.
By
comparison, the Greenwater novels are mostly told from the perspectives
of Tennel Grimbeck and Runya Sulemar. In addition, the world is much
less centered on these two than it is that they are somewhat placed at
the center of it. As a result, the other characters, when they get
their perspectives, are not so focused on the two main characters. As
such, both characters have fewer names than Lucretia due to this more
focused perspective in the story.
In the end, a simple drum
beat pattern is okay for a short story with few characters, but the
longer and more complex the story, the more notes you want to play
with. You might end up with enough names where it is a better analogy
to compare to a piano or xylophone, but do remember, that there is one
name that you want to use for every scene that a character appears in.
Their given name. The name that most completely defines them in the terms of the story.
There
are some reasons not to use a given name. If you want to conceal the
identity of a person in a scene for a time, then it is a good idea not
to use their names until you want them revealed. However, you'll want
to have some clues as to who they are, and giving hints of a descriptive
name is good for that.
A blog by Luke Garrison Green of Thrythlind Books and Games. Here he discusses writing skills, reviews books, discusses roleplaying games and refers to Divine Blood, Bystander and his other books.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Daggerheart Analysis
Daggerheart - What I've Seen So Far Template-Based Character Builds This will be familiar to players of D&D, Pathfinder 2e...
Popular Posts
-
This is a theoretical inspired by a picture. Specifically the one I've posted here which seems to be a piece of art from the Pathfinder...
-
I am pretty vocal about not being particularly fond of alignment and have never really used it in Dungeons and Dragons 5th Edition. That sa...
-
The idea of doing this came when a line I wrote in a fanfic sometime ago popped into my mind and I had to go look up the fanfic to see wh...
-
A quick summary of character creation using FAE mostly for use with my online convention games.
-
I've wanted to do a Divine Archer for a while now and had been focused on the Paladin due to Divine Smite. This is especially true once...
No comments:
Post a Comment