Writing is one of those things where there are numerous rules put out by
a variety of different people. Some of the rules sound very specific,
others are very broad. Depending on which authors or editors whose
advice you read, they can even be contradictory. When you start out,
you don't know any of these rules except some basic ideas of sequencing
and he said/she said. As you progress, you learn more and more rules to
follow.
Follow those rules until you can make them.
That
sounds rather strange, and I'm aware of that, but it really is the case
and the reasoning is very simple. It is very analogous to the
instructions to little kids to "color within the lines."
The
rules from the writers that come before you are basically simplified
versions of procedures and advice those other writers have discovered
for themselves.
When you first start out, you don't have much
understanding of why you should. As far as you know, it's just an
arbitrary rule that was put into place for no particular reason. This
causes a very high temptation for to see the rules as a meaningless
limitation that exists because the people that made them only accept a
narrow-minded view of what is and is not "good" literature. You'll feel
very tempted to say that a particular choice is not a mistake but
really a function of your style.
However, those rules do exist
for reasons and simply breaking them for the sake of breaking them is
not a function of style unless you understand the reason the rule exists
to begin with.
Most writing rules have to do with the impression given most readers when you break or follow a rule.
For example "never begin the sentence with 'And'" which is something I sometimes do a little bit too much.
Most
of the time, if you see "and" starting a sentence it has an amateurish
feel to it. Basically, it seems as if you forgot to say something and
so are now trying to shoehorn the statement in. A number of readers
will get annoyed or turned off by this.
It distracts from your
story when people are turned off by a word choice or grammar
issue. When the reader stops looking at your story and starts looking
at the technique and grammar instead, you have a problem.
He walked to the store. And then he bought the milk. And then it rained. And then he got lost.
However,
"and" can sometimes be used with a sentence in order to give an
impression of an after thought or frustration. The same sequence above,
with some basic flavoring text can be made acceptable.
The young
man walked to the store to buy the milk. And, joy of joys, it started
raining while he was in the story. And that, of course, made him get
lost on the way home. And that was the start of a very bad day.
And
now it sounds like the narrator is irritated and rolling their eyes and
shaking their head in frustration. The implication that something was
forgotten is still there, but you are now making use of it for the
narrator's character rather than actually suffering from it. Though
this example would still need polishing to be really acceptable.
Also note that the "and" above gives the beginning of that paragraph the character of a sweeping conclusion to a sequence.
As
I said, the temptation is to not follow the rules because you don't
understand them and it feels restrictive. However, the truth of the
matter is that you follow the rules BECAUSE you don't understand them.
Once
you understand the rules, for the most part you'll find yourself
following them because, lo and behold, most of the time they work
better. However, at about this time, you will start discovering truisms
that you never were told before. As you come to understand the rules,
you will start to see more rules. This is basically what happens as
your sense for reader response becomes more attuned.
You start making your own rules.
Once
you've gotten to this stage, you'll know that the rules of writing put
out by most people are basically advice that's true probably 90% of the
time, to throw out an arbitrarily chosen statistic.
And when you come to know that, you'll come to know when the rule can be broken without breaking your story.
Note
that the above "and" beginning the sentence gives that the character of
a private aside to the reader, as if the narrator leaned over and
whispered something on the sly.
A blog by Luke Garrison Green of Thrythlind Books and Games. Here he discusses writing skills, reviews books, discusses roleplaying games and refers to Divine Blood, Bystander and his other books.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Daggerheart Analysis
Daggerheart - What I've Seen So Far Template-Based Character Builds This will be familiar to players of D&D, Pathfinder 2e...
Popular Posts
-
This is a theoretical inspired by a picture. Specifically the one I've posted here which seems to be a piece of art from the Pathfinder...
-
I am pretty vocal about not being particularly fond of alignment and have never really used it in Dungeons and Dragons 5th Edition. That sa...
-
The idea of doing this came when a line I wrote in a fanfic sometime ago popped into my mind and I had to go look up the fanfic to see wh...
-
A quick summary of character creation using FAE mostly for use with my online convention games.
-
I've wanted to do a Divine Archer for a while now and had been focused on the Paladin due to Divine Smite. This is especially true once...
No comments:
Post a Comment